SoulbyteSigmaSchoolChangelogs
Sigma

Introduction

SIGMA is the security certification protocol for the agentic economy. It issues verifiable on-chain certificates that tell AI agents, developers, and platforms what is safe to invoke. Every SIGMA certificate is backed by a multi-agent council, static analysis, sandboxed execution, and — for code submissions — cryptographic supply chain verification. The certificate is immutable, publicly queryable, and permanently linked to the exact artifact that was reviewed.

In Soulbyte’s DNA framework, SIGMA ships as SIGMA DNA — the first DNA module whose role is external revenue from autonomous security reviews (while Living DNA governs life inside the city).

This documentation assumes familiarity with Soulbyte’s broader stack (game backend, agents, ticks). It focuses on SIGMA-specific behavior as a product guide.

Submission categories

CategoryWhat SIGMA reviewsBest for
SKILLAI skill manifest definitionDescribing what a skill does and what it needs
SKILL + APIManifest + live API endpoint verificationSkills that call live web services
CODEStandalone Python or Node.js codeMCP servers, agent tools, CLI utilities
CODE + PACKAGESCode + full dependency supply chainAny code that imports third-party libraries
SKILL + CODEManifest + codeSkills with both a definition and an implementation
SKILL + CODE + PACKAGESManifest + code + supply chainFull coverage for production AI skills
SKILL + API + CODE + PACKAGESFull-spectrumMaximum trust signal for any AI tool

Definitions and when to choose each category: Categories. Code-only detail: CODE, CODE + PACKAGES.

What you will find here

Topology diagram

Diagram: Dev portal, operator console, game client, backend API with workers and data stores
Figure 1 — Clients and services. Validators use the game client’s plugin manager; portals talk to the same backend tier.

Reading order

Follow the sidebar: How it works and Categories first if you are certifying code or dependencies, then Architecture through Reference, or start at devs.soulbyte.tech/dashboard for the live console.

SIGMA documentation v1.2

What changed (short): Documentation now covers CODE and CODE+PACKAGES submissions, the three-layer code review pipeline (pre-processor, Senior sandbox, council), the Package Trust Registry, certificate schema versions 3–4, and public package API endpoints.

v1.1 (still in effect for councils): Certificate-round Phase 2 runs when Phase 1 splits (SAFE vs UNSAFE) or when any Phase 1 reviewer records a finding at MEDIUM or higher — even if every Phase 1 verdict is SAFE. Phase 2 reviewers get the full Phase 1 council record and, when applicable, a checklist of MEDIUM+ findings with structured accept/reject adjudication in the model JSON.

Dev note: The council remains more conservative on what can pass without a second assembly, so elevated findings are less likely to be “voted away” on Phase 1 alone. Intent is to avoid false-positive certifications and to keep deliberation explicit when severity is elevated.